DOI: 10.14704/nq.2018.16.6.1660

Trust Game and Behaviour Pattern of Public-Private Partnership Project Management Team Based on EEG

Jinglei Meng, Guoyi Xiu


The Public-Private Partnership (PPP) project is currently one of the main ways for countries to get back from the economic downturn and realize entrepreneurial economy. If the management team wants to achieve long-term stable and vigorous development, it must establish a lasting and reliable trust relationship. The neuroscience research on game has provided new methods and ideas for the study of trust. Based on the game and ERP experiments, this paper constructs a model for the relationships between the factors of trust, individual risk preferences and partner’s behaviours and the investment behaviours. At the same time, based on the EEG data with ERP components, this paper further analyzes the internal neural influencing mechanism of how various factors affect the cognitive process and decision-making attitude of trust, modifies, tests and re-modifies the experimental model through enterprise interviews and SEM; and finally obtains the model for the trust recognition mechanism and behaviour pattern among members of the PPP project management team, and proposes measures to keep long-term stable trust between members of the project management team, so as to promote the development and expansion of the PPP project management team


EEG, PPP Project Management Team, Game, ERP, SEM

Full Text:



Bailie R, Si D, Shannon C, Semmens J, Rowley K, Scrimgeour DJ. Study protocol: national research partnership to improve primary health care performance and outcomes for indigenous peoples. BMC Health Services Research 2010; 10(1): 1-11.

Clampit J, Kedia B, Fabian F, Gaffney N. Offshoring satisfaction: the role of partnership credibility and cultural complementarity. Journal of World Business 2005; 50(1): 79-93.

Dickinson H, Peck E, Davidson D. Opportunity seized or missed? a case study of leadership and organizational change in the creation of a care trust. Journal of Interprofessional Care 2007; 21(5): 503.

Grover V, Cheon MJ, Teng JTC. The effect of service quality and partnership on the outsourcing of information systems functions. Journal of Management Information Systems 1996; 12(4): 89-116.

Kanmogne M, Eskridge KM. Identifying some major determinants of entrepreneurial partnership, using a confounded factorial conjoint choice experiment. Quality & Quantity 2013; 47(2): 943-60.

King JC, LaGrone RP, Miller SF. The Patient and Physician in Partnership. Southern Medical Journal 1984;77(3):360-66.

Lippincott RC, Wilson WH, Godard SL, Cutler DL, Angell RH. Disseminating the partnership: the pew memorial trust state-university collaboration project. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 1993; 20(6): 471-79.

Moon SG, Jeong S, Choi Y. Moderating effects of trust on environmentally significant behavior in Korea. Sustainability 2017; 9(3): 415.

O'Neill P, Whatmore S, Henry N, Pollard J. The business of place: networks of property, partnership and produce. Geoforum 2000; 31(2): 121-36.

Shi S, Chong HY, Liu L, Ye X. Examining the interrelationship among critical success factors of public private partnership infrastructure projects. Sustainability 2016; 8(12): 1313.

Suh T, Kwon IWG. Matter over mind: when specific asset investment affects calculative trust in supply chain partnership. Industrial Marketing Management 2006; 35(2): 191-201.

Wilson AD, Mouzas S, Henneberg S, Naudé P. Trust and reliance in business relationships. European Journal of Marketing 2007; 41(9): 1016-32.

Yeung K, Lee PKC, Yeung ACL, Cheng TCE. Supplier partnership and cost performance: the moderating roles of specific investments and environmental uncertainty. International Journal of Production Economics 2013; 144(2): 546-59.

Supporting Agencies

| NeuroScience + QuantumPhysics> NeuroQuantology :: Copyright 2001-2019