DOI: 10.14704/nq.2018.16.10.1854

Machine vs Human: Similarities and Differences

Daegene Song


With the recent advancements in the area of artificial intelligence and robotics, there is much discussion about how far the technology will advance and whether AI might even surpass the general capacity of humans in both mental and physical ability, a hypothesis known as technological singularity. The similarities and differences between machines and humans based on the science of computation and philosophy are addressed. Indeed, starting from investigating physics problems, one is led to adopt a new perspective on the machine and human consciousness based on cyclical time. In particular, this model involves not only a physical system, as has often been the case in science, but also mental aspects as a fundamental and integral part of a complete picture. Unlike science, philosophy has been investigating both physical and mental states and characteristics since the era of the ancient Greeks, and it has been posited that the new model of existence derived from physics and comparing machine and human indeed bears a resemblance to a number of philosophical thoughts, particularly from the school of existentialism.


Artificial Intelligence, Consciousness, Philosophy, Quantum theory

Full Text:



Bekenstein JD. Black holes and entropy. Physical Review D 1973; 7(8): 2333-2346.

Burt MG. On The Peierls Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.11162. 2018.

Chomsky N. Review of B.F. Skinners's verbal behavior. Language 1959; 35: 26-58.

Gödel K. Uber formal unentscheidbare Satze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter Systeme I. Monatshefte fur Mathematik Und Physik 1931; 38(1):173-98.

Hameroff S. Quantum computation in brain microtubules? The Penrose-Hameroff'Orch OR'model of consciousness. Philosophical Transactions-Royal Society of London Series A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences 1998:1869-95.

Hawking SW. Black holes and thermodynamics. Physical Review D 1976; 13(2): 191-97.

Heidegger M. Being and time. New York: Harper and Row, 1962.

Lévi-Strauss C. The structural study of myth. The journal of American folklore 1955; 68(270): 428-44.

Moravec H. Mind children. Harvard: Harvard University Press, 1988.

Peierls R. In defence of “Measurement”. Physics World 1991; 4(1):19–20.

Penrose R. The emperor's new mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.

Pribram KH. Quantum holography: Is it relevant to brain function?. Information Sciences 1999; 115(1–4): 97–102.

Song D. Negative entropy and black hole information. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 2014; 53(4): 1369-74.

Song D. Decision-making process and information. NeuroQuant 2017; 15(4): 31-36.

Tegmark M. Importance of quantum decoherence in brain processes. Physical review E 2000; 61(4): 4194-4206.

Church A, Turing A. On Computable Numbers with an Application to the Entscheidungs Problems. Proc. of the London Math. Society 1936; 2(42): 230-65.

Vinge V. The coming technological singularity: how to survive in the post-human era. Interdisciplinary Science and Engineering in the Era of Cyberspace, G. A. Landis, ed., NASA Publication, 1993:11–22,.

Wittgenstein L. Tractatus logico-philosophicus, International Library of Psychology, Philosophy, and Scientific Method. Trans. CK Ogden, 8th impr. London, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1922.

Supporting Agencies

| NeuroScience + QuantumPhysics> NeuroQuantology :: Copyright 2001-2019