DOI: 10.14704/nq.2019.17.2.1971

Wavelet Phase Coherence Estimation of EEG Signals for Neuromarketing Studies

Gamze Ural, Fırat KAÇAR, Sinan CANAN


This paper presents an Electroencephalography (EEG), Pulse Plethysmography (PPG) and Galvanic Skin Response (GSR) study for neuromarketing studies, which are related to analysis of relationship between electrodes and emotional stress across to commercial advertisement. Neuromarketing is a field of study with respect the application of neuroscience methods to analyze consumer behavior related to markets. Wavelet coherence (WC) and phase difference (PD) were used for investigating how the marketing stimuli induced the degree of information flow occurs between electrodes of EEG.
Pulse rate variability (PRV) obtained from finger PPG and computed the powers in high frequency (HF), low frequency (LF). The powers in the LF and HF bands are regulated by Autonomic nervous systems (ANS) and then, Skin conductance level (SCL) computed from GSR by measuring changes in the conductivity of the skin. These electrophysiological measurements computed to evaluate emotional stress.
The signals were recorded simultaneously from 30 subjects for two stages: prior to advertising stimuli (control stage) and during the advertising stimuli (experimental stage) using iMotions system in Uskudar University (Istanbul, Turkey).
The WC and PD for each electrode pairs were computed for five frequency sub-bands (delta, theta, alpha, beta and gamma) of EEG. While the value of WC was generally higher in experimental stage than control stage especially in the theta, alpha and beta frequency, the value of PD was generally lower especially in gamma band. An increase of interhemispheric coherence in experimental stage occurred in the anterior frontal -temporal-parietal- area. At the same time, the LF/HF ratio and SCL were generally higher in experimental stage. We investigated whether there were statistically significant differences in WC, PD, the LF/HF ratio and SCL between the experimental and control stage. Results were demonstrated significant differences in WC and PD, LF/HF ratio between experimental stage and control stage, but there was not in SCL.


Neuromarketing, Wavelet- Phase Coherence, Pulse Plethysmography, Galvanic Skin Response, Emotional responses

Full Text:



Alexandridis AK, Zapranis AD. Wavelet neural networks: with applications in financial engineering, chaos, and classification: John Wiley & Sons; 2014.

Andrejevic M. Infoglut: How too much information is changing the way we think and know: Routledge; 2013.

Astolfi L, Cincotti F, Mattia D, Marciani MG, Baccala LA, Fallani FDV. Assessing cortical functional connectivity by partial directed coherence: simulations and application to real data. 2006; 53(9): 1802-1812.

Astolfi L, Fallani FDV, Cincotti F, Mattia D, Bianchi L, Marciani M. Neural basis for brain responses to TV commercials: a high-resolution EEG study. 2008; 16(6): 522-531.

Auth C. Continuous Wavelet Transform and Wavelet Coherence-Implementation and Application to the Diversification Analysis of Hedge Funds Returns. 2013.

Bloomfield DS, McAteer RJ, Lites BW, Judge PG, Mathioudakis M, Keenan FP. Wavelet phase coherence analysis: application to a quiet-sun magnetic element. 2004; 617(1): 623.

Chatfield C. Introduction to multivariate analysis: Routledge; 2018.

Fallani FDV, Astolfi L, Cincotti F, Mattia D, Tocci A, Marciani MG. Extracting information from cortical connectivity patterns estimated from high resolution EEG recordings: a theoretical graph approach. 2007; 19(3): 125-136.

Fein G, Raz J, Brown FF, Merrin EL. Common reference coherence data are confounded by power and phase effects. 1988; 69(6): 581-584.

Gani MO, Reza S, Rabi MRI, Reza S. Neuromarketing: methodologies of marketing science. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Advances in Economics, Management and Social Study; 2015.

Grinsted A, Moore JC, Jevrejeva S. Application of the cross wavelet transform and wavelet coherence to geophysical time series. 2004; 11(5/6): 561-566.

Handayani N, Haryanto F, Khotimah SN, Arif I, Taruno WP. Coherence and phase synchrony analyses of EEG signals in Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI): A study of functional brain connectivity. 2018; 24(1): 1-9.

Hramov AE, Koronovskii AA, Makarov VA, Pavlov AN, Sitnikova E. Wavelets in neuroscience: Springer; 2015.

Lee N, Broderick AJ, Chamberlain LJIjop. What is ‘neuromarketing’? A discussion and agenda for future research. 2007; 63(2): 199-204.

Nunez PL, Silberstein RB, Shi Z, Carpenter MR, Srinivasan R, Tucker DM. EEG coherency II: experimental comparisons of multiple measures. 1999; 110(3): 469-486.

Nunez PL, Srinivasan R, Westdorp AF, Wijesinghe RS, Tucker DM, Silberstein RB. EEG coherency: I: statistics, reference electrode, volume conduction, Laplacians, cortical imaging, and interpretation at multiple scales. 1997; 103(5): 499-515.

Okkesim Ş, Çelik G, Yıldırım MS, Ilhan MM, Karaman Ö, Taşan E. Comparison of Pulse Rate Variability and Heart Rate Variability for Hypoglycemia Syndrome. 2016; 55(03): 250-257.

Sakkalis V, Oikonomou T, Pachou E, Tollis I, Micheloyannis S, Zervakis M. Time-significant wavelet coherence for the evaluation of schizophrenic brain activity using a graph theory approach. Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2006; 4265-4268

Sakkalis V. Review of advanced techniques for the estimation of brain connectivity measured with EEG/MEG. 2011; 41(12): 1110-1117.

Stoline MR. The status of multiple comparisons: simultaneous estimation of all pairwise comparisons in one-way ANOVA designs. 1981; 35(3): 134-141.

Thatcher R, Krause P, Hrybyk M. Cortico-cortical associations and EEG coherence: a two-compartmental model. 1986; 64(2): 123-143.

Torrence C, Compo GP. A practical guide to wavelet analysis. 1998; 79(1): 61-78.

Vecchiato G, Cherubino P, Trettel A, Babiloni F. Neuroelectrical brain imaging tools for the study of the efficacy of TV advertising stimuli and their application to neuromarketing: Springer; 2013.

Vecchiato G, Astolfi L, Fallani FDV, Toppi J, Aloise F, Bez F, et al. On the use of EEG or MEG brain imaging tools in neuromarketing research. 2011; 3.

Vecchiato G, Astolfi L, Fallani FDV, Cincotti F, Mattia D, Salinari S. Changes in brain activity during the observation of TV commercials by using EEG, GSR and HR measurements. 2010; 23(2): 165-179.

Zurawicki L. Neuromarketing: Exploring the brain of the consumer: Springer Science & Business Media; 2010.

Supporting Agencies

| NeuroScience + QuantumPhysics> NeuroQuantology :: Copyright 2001-2019