DOI: 10.14704/nq.2017.15.2.1034

Where is Nonlocality?

Robert W. Boyer

Abstract


Nonlocality has been supported by experimental evidence since the 1980s. This paper offers a theoretical framework for what and where it is, based on recent quantum field theories that identify three levels of nature: 1) finite local field of physical matter/energy; 2) infinite unified field; and 3) finite nonlocal field in-between. The in-between level is where ‘quantum mind’ is placed; and for the first time in modern science, this allows a logically coherent model of how mind causally influences brain and behavior. Importantly, these three-level models are converging toward the ancient Vedic 3-in-1 holistic account of ontological levels of nature. They reflect revolutionary progress on foundational issues about the matter-mind-consciousness relationship.

Keywords


locality; nonlocality; ontological levels; quantum mind; 3-in-1 Vedic account

Full Text:

Full Text PDF

References


Aspect A, Grangier P, Roger G. Experimental realization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm Gedankenexperiment: A new violation of Bell’s Inequalities. Phys Rev Lett 2002; 49: 91.

Aspect A, Dalibard J, Roger G. Experimental test of Bell’s Inequalities using time-varying analyzers. Phys Rev Lett 1982; 49: 1804.

Bell JS. Speakable and unspeakable in quantum mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1987.

Bohm D. Wholeness and the implicate order. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. 1980.

Bohm D, Hiley BJ. The undivided universe. London: Routledge. 1993.

Boyer RW. Bridge to unity: Unified field-based science and spirituality. Malibu CA: Institute for Advanced Research. 2008.

Boyer RW. A critique of scientific realism based in Vedic principles. NeuroQuantology, 2013; 11(3); 477-502.

Boyer RW. The Place and Role of Consciousness in Human Psychoarchitecture. NeuroQuantology 2011; 9 (2).

Boyer RW. Making Room for Mental Space. NeuroQuantology 2009; 7(3): 457-481.

Boyer RW. Unless we are robots, classical and quantum theories are fundamentally inadequate. J NeuroQuantology 2014; 12 (1): 102-125.

Boyer RW. Linking mind and matter: A new perspective for a scientific model that unifies nonlocal mind and local matter. Malibu CA: Institute for Advanced Research. 2012.

Davies P, Gregersen NH (eds.) Information and the nature of reality: from physics to meta-physics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.

Descartes R. The philosophical works of Descartes. 2 vols. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press (original works 1616-1648). 1972.

Einstein A. (Accessed 2008). Quoted in: Thinkexist.com. http://en.thinkexist.com/quotation/15496.html. 2008.

Einstein A, Podolsky B, Rosen N. Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phy Rev 1935; 47: 777-780.

Greene B. The fabric of the cosmos: space, time, and the texture of reality. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. 2004.

Hagelin JS. Is consciousness the unified field? A field theorist’s perspective. 1987. Modern Science and Vedic Science. 1987; 1(1): 29-87.

Hagelin JS. Restructuring physics from its foundation in light of Maharishi’s Vedic Science. Modern Science and Vedic Science 1989; 3(1): 3-72.

Herbert N. Quantum reality: Beyond the new physics. New York: Anchor Books. 1985.

Locke J. An essay concerning human understanding. A. Fraser (ed.) New York: Dover Publications (original, 1690). 1959.

Maharishi Vedic University: Introduction. Holland: Maharishi Vedic University Press. 1994.

Maharishi Mahesh Yogi. Maharishi Mahesh Yogi on the Bhagavad-Gita: A new translation and commentary, chapters 1-6. London: Penguin Books; 1967.

Maharishi Mahesh Yogi. Science of Being and art of living. Washington DC: Age of Enlightenment Publications. 1963.

Peat FD. (Accessed 2016). Non-locality in Nature and Cognition.

Penrose R. The road to reality: A complete guide to the laws of the universe. New York: Alfred A. Knopf; 2005.

Radin D, Borges A. Intuition through time: What does the seer see? Explore: The Journal of Science and Health 2009; 5(4): 200-211.

Schwartz JM & Begley S. The mind and the brain: Neuroplasticity and the power of mental force. New York: HarperCollins Publishers, Inc. 2002.

Stapp HP. The hard problem: A quantum approach. In: Shear J, (ed.) Explaining consciousness—the hard problem. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press, pp. 197-215. 2000.

Stapp HP. Mindful universe: Quantum mechanics and the participating observer. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer-Verlag. 2007.

Tegmark M. Our Mathematical Universe: My quest for the ultimate nature of reality. Alfred A. Knopf. 2014.

Walker EW. The physics of consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books. 2000.


Supporting Agencies

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.



| NeuroScience + QuantumPhysics> NeuroQuantology :: Copyright 2001-2017