ERP Evidence for Chinese Compound Word Recognition: Does Morpheme Work all the Time?
Andrews S. Morphological influences on lexical access: Lexical or nonlexical effects? Journal of Memory and Language 1986; 25, 726-740.
Andrews S. Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 1989; 15, 802-814.
Caramazza A, Laudanna A, Romani C. Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition 1988; 28, 297-332.
Chen B and Peng D. The Influence of Concreteness of Worgs on Word Recognition. Acta Psychologica Sinica 1998; 30, 387-393. (in Chinese, abstract in English).
Chen B and Peng D. The Effects of Polysemy in Chinese two-character Word Identification. Acta Psychologica Sinica 2003; 35, 569-575. (in Chinese, abstract in English).
De Groot AMB. Representational aspects of word imageability and word frequency assessed through word association. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1989; 15,824-845.
Hyönä J and Pollatsek A. The role of component morphemes on eye fixations when reading Finnish compound words. Journal of experimental psychology Human perception and performance 1998; 24, 1612-1627.
Fiorentino R and Poeppel D. Compound words and structure in the lexicon. Lang. Cogn. Processes 2007; 22, 953-1000.
Garlock VM, Walley AC, Metsala JL. Age-of-acquisition, word frequency and neighborhood density effects on spoken word recognition by children and adults. Journal of Memory and Language 2001; 45, 468-492.
Holcomb Phillip J, Kounios John, Anderson Jane E, West W Caroline. Dual-coding, context-availability, and concreteness effects in sentence comprehension: An electrophysiological investigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1999; 25, 721-742.
Jarema G, Busson C, Nikolova R, Tsapkini K, Libben G. Processing compounds: A cross-linguistic study. Brain & Language 1999; 68, 362-369.
Juhasz BJ, Starr MS, Inhoff AW, Placke L. The effects of morphology on the processing of compound words: evidence from naming, lexical decisions and eye fixations. British journal of psychology 2003; 94, 223–244.
Kounios John, Holcomb Phillip J. Concreteness effects in semantic processing: ERP evidence supporting dual-coding theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1994; 20, 804-823.
Kroll JF, Merves JS. Lexical access for concrete and abstract words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1986; 12, 92-107.
Libben Gary, Martha Gibson, Yeo Bom Yoon, Dominiek Sandra. Compound fracture: The role of semantic transparency and morphological headedness. Brain and Language 2003; 84, 26-43.
M. Vergara-Martínez, Jon A Duñabeitia, Itziar Laka, Manuel Carreiras. ERP correlates of inhibitory and facilitative effects of constituent frequency in compound word reading. Brain Research 2009; 1257, 53-64.
Miwa K, G Libben, H Baayen. Semantic radicals in Japanese two-character word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes 2012; 27, 142-158
Myers J, Derwing B, Libben G. The effect of priming direction on reading Chinese compounds. Mental Lexicon Working Papers 2004; 1, 69-86.
Myers J. Processing Chinese compounds: A survey of the literature. In G. Libben and G. Jarema (Eds.). The representation and processing of compound words. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
Miwa K and Dijkstra T. Lexical processes in the recognition of Japanese horizontal and vertical compounds. Reading and Writing (2017); 30(4), 791–812
Seidenberg MS. Sublexical structures in visual word recognition: Access units or orthographic redundancy? In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance: The psychology of reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.7, 1987.
Seidenberg MS. Reading complex word. In G. Carlson & M. Tanenhaus (Eds.). Linguistic Structure in Language Processing. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989.
Seidenberg MS, McClelland JL. A Distributed, Developmental Model of Word Recognition and Naming. Psychological Review 1989; 96, 523-568.
Shoolman N, Andrews S. Racehorses, reindeers and sparrows: using masked priming to investigate morphological influences on word identification. In: Kinoshita, S., Lupker, S. (Eds.), Masked Priming: The State of the Art. Psychology Press, Hove, UK, 2003.
Taft M, Forster KI. Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1975; 14, 638-647.
Taft M and Forster KI. Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1976; 15, 607-620.
Taft M. The body of the BOSS: Subsyllabic units in the lexical processing of polysyllabic words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1992; 18, 1004-1014.
Taft M, Huang JT, Zhu X. The influence of character frequency on word recognition responses in Chinese. In H.-W. Chang, J.-T. Huang, C.-W. Hue, O. J. L. Tzeng (Eds.), Advances in the study of Chinese language processing 1994; 1, 59-73.
Peng D, Zhang B, Liu Z. Lexical decomposition and whole word storage of Chinese coordinative two-character word. Preceeding of the second Afro-Asian psychological congress.Beijing: Peking University Press, 1993.
Peng D, Liu Y, Wang C. How is access representation organized? The relation of polymorphemic words and their morphemes in Chinese. In J Wang, AW Inhoff, HC Chen (Eds.), Reading Chinese script: A cognitive analysis, 1999.
Pollatsek A, Hyönä J, Bertram R. The role of morphological constituents in reading Finnish compound words. Journal of experimental psychology Human perception and performance 2000; 26, 820-833.
Pylkkänen L, Feintuch S, Hopkins E, Marantz A. Neural correlates of the effects of morphological family frequency and family size: an MEG study. Cognition 2004; 91, B35–B45.
Wang W. Lexical Access to Chinese Coordinative Words. Acta Psychologica Sinica 2001; 33,117-122 (in Chinese, abstract in English).
Zhang B and Peng D. Decomposed storage in the Chinese lexicon. In H.-C. Chen & O. J.L. Tzeng (Eds.), Language processing in Chinese. Elevier Science Publishers B.V., 1992.
Zhang Q, Zhang BY. Research on concreteness effects of Chinese two-character words. Acta Psychologica Sinica 1997; 29, 216–224 (in Chinese, abstract in English).
Zhang Q, Guo CY, Ding JH, Wang ZY. Concreteness effects in the processing of Chinese words. Brain and Language 2006; 96, 59-68.
Zhang X, Han Z, Bi Y. Are abstract and concrete concepts organized differently? Evidence from the blocked translation paradigm. Applied Psycholinguistics 2013; 34, 1059–1092.
Zhou X, Marslen-Wilson W, Taft M, Shu H. Morphology, orthography, and phonology in reading Chinese compound words. Language and Cognitive Processes 1999; 14, 525-565.
West W Caroline and Holcomb Phillip J. Imaginal, semantic, and surface-level processing of concrete and abstract words: An electrophysiological investigation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2000; 12, 1024-1037.
Liu Yuan. Dictionary Of Frequently Used Words (Chang Yong Ci Pin Ci Dian) (Eds.). Beijing: Astronautics Publishing House, 1990.
Shaki S, Fischer M H, Petrusic WM. Reading habits for both words and numbers contribute to the SNARC effect. Psychon Bull Rev 2009; 16(2), 328-331.
Vergara-Martinez M, Dunabeitia JA, Laka I, Carreiras M. ERP correlates of inhibitory and facilitative effects of constituent frequency in compound word reading. Brain Res 2009; 1257, 53-64.