DOI: 10.14704/nq.2017.15.3.1105

ERP Evidence for Chinese Compound Word Recognition: Does Morpheme Work all the Time?

Wenna Wang, Aitao Lu, Dongping He, Bao Zhang, John X Zhang

Abstract


By holding the homophonic morpheme constants, the present study examined the effects of word frequency and morpheme frequency on the recognition of Chinese compound word using event-related potential (ERP) measurements and a delay response lexical decision task (LDT). The results revealed that low frequency word elicited less positivity when its initial morpheme with high-frequency in the time windows of 150-250ms,but a reverse ERPs pattern was elicited in time windows of 250-400ms; Different from Vergara-Martínez et al.’s (2009) results, the morpheme frequency effect of final morpheme showed a robust inhibitory frequency effect as words with high frequency morpheme elicited larger negativity in both 250-400ms and 400-500ms time windows for both high and low frequency compound words. Additionally, whole word frequency showed consistent facilitative effects ranged from 150 to 400 ms windows for initial morpheme word conditions, and from 250 to 500 ms windows for final morpheme word conditions. Our results suggested that morpheme frequency affects the processing of Chinese compound word, which depends on the whole word frequency and the position of a morpheme in a compound word, providing evidence for the sub-lexical representations in Chinese compound word, and the different role of constituents in compound word comprehension.

Keywords


Chinese Compound Word, Word Processing, Morpheme Frequency, Whole Word Frequency, N400

Full Text:

PDF

References


Andrews S. Morphological influences on lexical access: Lexical or nonlexical effects? Journal of Memory and Language 1986; 25, 726-740.

Andrews S. Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 1989; 15, 802-814.

Caramazza A, Laudanna A, Romani C. Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition 1988; 28, 297-332.

Chen B and Peng D. The Influence of Concreteness of Worgs on Word Recognition. Acta Psychologica Sinica 1998; 30, 387-393. (in Chinese, abstract in English).

Chen B and Peng D. The Effects of Polysemy in Chinese two-character Word Identification. Acta Psychologica Sinica 2003; 35, 569-575. (in Chinese, abstract in English).

De Groot AMB. Representational aspects of word imageability and word frequency assessed through word association. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1989; 15,824-845.

Hyönä J and Pollatsek A. The role of component morphemes on eye fixations when reading Finnish compound words. Journal of experimental psychology Human perception and performance 1998; 24, 1612-1627.

Fiorentino R and Poeppel D. Compound words and structure in the lexicon. Lang. Cogn. Processes 2007; 22, 953-1000.

Garlock VM, Walley AC, Metsala JL. Age-of-acquisition, word frequency and neighborhood density effects on spoken word recognition by children and adults. Journal of Memory and Language 2001; 45, 468-492.

Holcomb Phillip J, Kounios John, Anderson Jane E, West W Caroline. Dual-coding, context-availability, and concreteness effects in sentence comprehension: An electrophysiological investigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1999; 25, 721-742.

Jarema G, Busson C, Nikolova R, Tsapkini K, Libben G. Processing compounds: A cross-linguistic study. Brain & Language 1999; 68, 362-369.

Juhasz BJ, Starr MS, Inhoff AW, Placke L. The effects of morphology on the processing of compound words: evidence from naming, lexical decisions and eye fixations. British journal of psychology 2003; 94, 223–244.

Kounios John, Holcomb Phillip J. Concreteness effects in semantic processing: ERP evidence supporting dual-coding theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1994; 20, 804-823.

Kroll JF, Merves JS. Lexical access for concrete and abstract words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1986; 12, 92-107.

Libben Gary, Martha Gibson, Yeo Bom Yoon, Dominiek Sandra. Compound fracture: The role of semantic transparency and morphological headedness. Brain and Language 2003; 84, 26-43.

M. Vergara-Martínez, Jon A Duñabeitia, Itziar Laka, Manuel Carreiras. ERP correlates of inhibitory and facilitative effects of constituent frequency in compound word reading. Brain Research 2009; 1257, 53-64.

Miwa K, G Libben, H Baayen. Semantic radicals in Japanese two-character word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes 2012; 27, 142-158

Myers J, Derwing B, Libben G. The effect of priming direction on reading Chinese compounds. Mental Lexicon Working Papers 2004; 1, 69-86.

Myers J. Processing Chinese compounds: A survey of the literature. In G. Libben and G. Jarema (Eds.). The representation and processing of compound words. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.

Miwa K and Dijkstra T. Lexical processes in the recognition of Japanese horizontal and vertical compounds. Reading and Writing (2017); 30(4), 791–812

Seidenberg MS. Sublexical structures in visual word recognition: Access units or orthographic redundancy? In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance: The psychology of reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.7, 1987.

Seidenberg MS. Reading complex word. In G. Carlson & M. Tanenhaus (Eds.). Linguistic Structure in Language Processing. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989.

Seidenberg MS, McClelland JL. A Distributed, Developmental Model of Word Recognition and Naming. Psychological Review 1989; 96, 523-568.

Shoolman N, Andrews S. Racehorses, reindeers and sparrows: using masked priming to investigate morphological influences on word identification. In: Kinoshita, S., Lupker, S. (Eds.), Masked Priming: The State of the Art. Psychology Press, Hove, UK, 2003.

Taft M, Forster KI. Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1975; 14, 638-647.

Taft M and Forster KI. Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1976; 15, 607-620.

Taft M. The body of the BOSS: Subsyllabic units in the lexical processing of polysyllabic words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1992; 18, 1004-1014.

Taft M, Huang JT, Zhu X. The influence of character frequency on word recognition responses in Chinese. In H.-W. Chang, J.-T. Huang, C.-W. Hue, O. J. L. Tzeng (Eds.), Advances in the study of Chinese language processing 1994; 1, 59-73.

Peng D, Zhang B, Liu Z. Lexical decomposition and whole word storage of Chinese coordinative two-character word. Preceeding of the second Afro-Asian psychological congress.Beijing: Peking University Press, 1993.

Peng D, Liu Y, Wang C. How is access representation organized? The relation of polymorphemic words and their morphemes in Chinese. In J Wang, AW Inhoff, HC Chen (Eds.), Reading Chinese script: A cognitive analysis, 1999.

Pollatsek A, Hyönä J, Bertram R. The role of morphological constituents in reading Finnish compound words. Journal of experimental psychology Human perception and performance 2000; 26, 820-833.

Pylkkänen L, Feintuch S, Hopkins E, Marantz A. Neural correlates of the effects of morphological family frequency and family size: an MEG study. Cognition 2004; 91, B35–B45.

Wang W. Lexical Access to Chinese Coordinative Words. Acta Psychologica Sinica 2001; 33,117-122 (in Chinese, abstract in English).

Zhang B and Peng D. Decomposed storage in the Chinese lexicon. In H.-C. Chen & O. J.L. Tzeng (Eds.), Language processing in Chinese. Elevier Science Publishers B.V., 1992.

Zhang Q, Zhang BY. Research on concreteness effects of Chinese two-character words. Acta Psychologica Sinica 1997; 29, 216–224 (in Chinese, abstract in English).

Zhang Q, Guo CY, Ding JH, Wang ZY. Concreteness effects in the processing of Chinese words. Brain and Language 2006; 96, 59-68.

Zhang X, Han Z, Bi Y. Are abstract and concrete concepts organized differently? Evidence from the blocked translation paradigm. Applied Psycholinguistics 2013; 34, 1059–1092.

Zhou X, Marslen-Wilson W, Taft M, Shu H. Morphology, orthography, and phonology in reading Chinese compound words. Language and Cognitive Processes 1999; 14, 525-565.

West W Caroline and Holcomb Phillip J. Imaginal, semantic, and surface-level processing of concrete and abstract words: An electrophysiological investigation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2000; 12, 1024-1037.

Liu Yuan. Dictionary Of Frequently Used Words (Chang Yong Ci Pin Ci Dian) (Eds.). Beijing: Astronautics Publishing House, 1990.

Shaki S, Fischer M H, Petrusic WM. Reading habits for both words and numbers contribute to the SNARC effect. Psychon Bull Rev 2009; 16(2), 328-331.

Vergara-Martinez M, Dunabeitia JA, Laka I, Carreiras M. ERP correlates of inhibitory and facilitative effects of constituent frequency in compound word reading. Brain Res 2009; 1257, 53-64.


Supporting Agencies

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2015A030310517).



| NeuroScience + QuantumPhysics> NeuroQuantology :: Copyright 2001-2019