DOI: 10.14704/nq.2017.15.4.1172

N400 and P600 Effect of Chinese Words Recognition

Enguo Wang, Guangya Zhou, Haiwei Huang, Qian Min, Wang Chao, Yanfeng Wang

Abstract


Word recognition is an important part of the processing in reading comprehension. N400 component is generally considered as semantic index of word processing, and P600 component is used to interpret syntactic processing. But the discovery of “Semantic P600” effect prompts people to interpret the meaning of P600 again. This study takes normal developing teenagers (ages 12-14) as research subject by using the event-related potentials (ERP) to examine the N400 and P600 effect of Chinese words processing of the true words and pseudo words recognition. The results show that the reaction time of the pseudo words are longer than that of the true words and N400 can also be evoked by the independent Chinese words; the pseudo words evoked larger amplitude of N400 than that of the true words. Compared with the true words, the latency of P600 of pseudo words are significantly delayed. The amplitudes of P600 evoked by true words are larger than by the Pseudo words. The present results suggest that N400 and P600 have different functions and significance in words recognition, N400 reflects the semantic priming effect, P600 reflects the semantic integration in the late stages of semantic processing.

Keywords


Words Recognition, True Word, Pseudo Word, N400; P600

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bai XJ, Hou Y. Lexical semantic properties of the initial processing of the degree of activation: Evidence from the ERP. Journal of Psychological Science, 2013; 36:258-64.

Bornkessel I, Schlesewsky M. The extended argument dependency model: a neurocognitive approach to sentence comprehension across languages. Psychological Review 2006; 113(4):787-821.

Bornkessel-Schlesewsky I, Schlesewsky M. An alternative perspective on “semantic P600” effects in language comprehension. Brain research Reviews 2008; 59(1):55-73.

Brouwer H, Fitz H, Hoeks J. Getting real about semantic illusions: rethinking the functional role of the P600 in language comprehension. Brain Research 2012; 1446:127-43.

Brown CM, Hagoort P, Chwilla DJ. An event-related brain potential analysis of visual word priming effects. Brain and Language 2000; 72(2):158-90.

Caplan D, Alpert N, Waters G. Effects of syntactic structure and propositional number on patterns of regional cerebral blood flow. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1998; 10(4):541-52.

Daltrozzo J, Wioland N, Kotchoubey B. The N400 and Late Positive Complex (LPC) effects reflect controlled rather than automatic mechanisms of sentence processing. Brain Sciences 2012; 2(3):267-97.

D'Arcy RC, Service E, Connolly JF, Hawco CS. The influence of increased working memory load on semantic neural systems: a high-resolution event-related brain potential study. Cognitive Brain Research 2005; 22(2):177-91.

Deacon D, Hewitt S, Yang CM, Nagata M. Event-related potential indices of semantic priming using masked and unmasked words: evidence that the N400 does not reflect a post-lexical process. Cognitive Brain Research 2000; 9(2):137-46.

Hoeks JC, Stowe LA, Doedens G. Seeing words in context: the interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading. Cognitive Brain Research 2004; 19(1):59-73.

Hohlfeld A, Martín-Loeches M, Sommer W. Is semantic processing during sentence reading autonomous or controlled? Evidence from the N400 component in a dual task paradigm. Advances in Cognitive Psychology 2015; 11(2):42-55.

Holcomb PJ, Grainger J, O'rourke T. An electrophysiological study of the effects of orthographic neighborhood size on printed word perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2002; 14(6):938-50.

Holcomb PJ. Semantic priming and stimulus degradation: Implications for the role of the N400 in language processing. Psychophysiology 1993; 30(1):47-61.

Just MA, Carpenter PA. A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review 1992; 99(1):122-49.

Kiefer M. The N400 is modulated by unconsciously perceived masked words: Further evidence for an automatic spreading activation account of N400 priming effects. Cognitive Brain Research 2002; 13(1):27-39.

Kim A, Osterhout L. The independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Memory and Language 2005; 52(2):205-25.

Kolk H, Chwilla D. Late positivities in unusual situations. Brain and Language 2007;100(3):257-61.

Kolk HH, Chwilla DJ, Van Herten M, Oor PJ. Structure and limited capacity in verbal working memory: A study with event-related potentials. Brain and language 2003;85(1):1-36.

Kuperberg GR, Sitnikova T, Caplan D, Holcomb PJ. Electrophysiological distinctions in processing conceptual relationships within simple sentences. Cognitive Brain Research 2003; 17(1):117-29.

Kuperberg GR. Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax. Brain research 2007;1146:23-49.

Kutas M, Federmeier KD. Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology 2011;62:621-647.

Kutas M, Hillyard SA. Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science 1980; 207(4427):203-05.

Nobre AC, McCarthy G. Language-related field potentials in the anterior-medial temporal lobe: II. Effects of word type and semantic priming. Journal of Neuroscience 1995; 15(2):1090-98.

Osterhout L, Holcomb PJ. Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language 1992;31(6):785-806.

Otten LJ, Rugg MD, Doyle MC. Modulation of event‐related potentials by word repetition: The role of visual selective attention. Psychophysiology 1993; 30(6):559-71.

Pulvermüller F, Mohr B, Lutzenberger W. Neurophysiological correlates of word and pseudo‐word processing in well‐recovered aphasics and patients with right‐hemispheric stroke. Psychophysiology 2004; 41(4):584-91.

Regel S, Meyer L, Gunter TC. Distinguishing neurocognitive processes reflected by P600 effects: Evidence from ERPs and neural oscillations. PloS one 2014;9(5):e96840.

Ruz M, Madrid E, Lupianez J, Tudela P. High density ERP indices of conscious and unconscious semantic priming. Cognitive Brain Research 2003;17(3):719-31.

Shu H, Bai XL, Han ZZ, Bi YC. Lexical Representation and Processing Theory and evidence of cognitive neuropsychology. Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology 2003; 9: 41-45.

Spotorno N, Cheylus A, Van Der Henst JB, Noveck IA. What’s behind a P600? Integration operations during irony processing. Plos One 2013;8(6):e66839.

Titone DA, Salisbury DF. Contextual modulation of N400 amplitude to lexically ambiguous words. Brain and Cognition 2004; 55(3):470-78.

Van Herten M, Chwilla DJ, Kolk HH. When heuristics clash with parsing routines: ERP evidence for conflict monitoring in sentence perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2006;18(7):1181-97.

Van Herten M, Kolk HH, Chwilla DJ. An ERP study of P600 effects elicited by semantic anomalies. Cognitive Brain Research 2005; 22(2):241-55.

Van Petten C, Luka BJ. Neural localization of semantic context effects in electromagnetic and hemodynamic studies. Brain and Language 2006;97(3):279-93.

Vissers CT, Chwilla DJ, Kolk HH. Monitoring in language perception: The effect of misspellings of words in highly constrained sentences. Brain Research 2006; 1106(1):150-63.

Vissers CT, Kolk HH, Van de Meerendonk N, Chwilla DJ. Monitoring in language perception: evidence from ERPs in a picture–sentence matching task. Neuropsychologia 2008; 46(4):967-82.

Whitney C. Semantic Asymmetries must Originate in a Visual Asymmetry. The Neural Basis of Reading. Oxford University Press, 2010:47.

Ye Z, Zhou XL. Involvement of executive control during sentence comprehension: ERP evidence. Brain Research 2008; 1203:103-15.

Zhang QF, Yang YF. Chinese Word Production semantics, shape and time course of phonological activation. Acta Psychologica Sinica 2004; 36:1-8.

Zhou XL, Lu XM, Shu,H. The nature of sub-lexical level of processing: the shape next to the voice-activated. Acta Psychologica Sinica 2000; 32:20-24.


Supporting Agencies





| NeuroScience + QuantumPhysics> NeuroQuantology :: Copyright 2001-2017