In this work a very simple model of physical experiential creation is developed and then used to provide a single, consistent, and clear solution to the riddles posed by the phenomena that lie at the heart of quantum physics. By providing a unitary framework for understanding all of these heretofore inexplicable phenomena, this model demonstrates that physical reality is a reality that has to be created in order to be known. What this model also demonstrates is that the way in which physical reality is created is through a specific type of relation that takes place at a level of reality that is more fundamental than the physical level of reality. Understanding that physical reality has to be created in order to be known first makes it possible to recognize the experiential mechanism that produces wave-particle duality. Recognizing that experiential mechanism then makes it possible to identify and define the fundamental limitation that exists in the creation of physical experience that produces quantum uncertainty. Following that, that same experiential mechanism and limitation is then used to explain both the creation and collapse of the wave function, as well as quantum nonlocality. Ultimately, this model of physical experiential creation, by providing a single solution to all of these heretofore insoluble riddles, allows for the unification of classical and quantum physical experiential reality, by demonstrating that the only difference between determinate classical physical reality and indeterminate quantum physical reality lies in the relational conditions under which each of these physical experiential realities is created. What this model also makes clear is that the probability or randomness that is so much a part of quantum theory is not an actual feature of reality, but is only an artifact of the process by which quantum physical reality is created, thereby vindicating Einstein for his never-relinquished view that reality is not fundamentally probabilistic.
wave-particle duality, uncertainty, wave function, nonlocality, experience, reality, complementarity, quantum physics
Born M. The Born-Einstein Letters. New York: Walker and Company, 1971.
Davisson CJ. The diffraction of electrons by a crystal of nickel. Bell System Technical Journal 1928; 7(1): 90–105.
Erhart J, Sponar S, Sulyok G, Badurek G, Ozawa M, Hasegawa Y. Experimental demonstration of a universally valid error–disturbance uncertainty relation in spin measurements. Nature Physics 2012; 8(3): 185–89.
Feynman, R. The Character of Physical Law. Modern Library, 1965.
Gröblacher S , Paterek T, Kaltenbaek R, Brukner C, Żukowski M, Aspelmeyer M, Zeilinger A. An experimental test of non-local realism. Nature 2007; 446(7138): 871-75.
Heisenberg W. Physics and Philosophy: The Revolution in Modern Science. Harper & Row, New York, 1962.
Rozema LA, Darabi A, Mahler DH, Hayat A, Soudagar Y, Steinberg AM. Violation of Heisenberg’s measurement-disturbance relationship by weak measurements. Physical Review Letters 2012; 109(10):100404.