Electroencephalogram Experiment Based Analysis of Aesthetic Fatigue on Chinese Traditional Garden
Amorim P, Moraes T, Fazanaro D, Silva J, Pedrini H. Electroencephalogram signal classification based on shearlet and contourlet transforms. Expert Systems with Applications 2017; 67: 140-47.
Bajwa G, Dantu R, Nana A. Quantifying dynamic cerebral autoregulation using electroencephalograms. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2015; 96(10): e69.
Schüpbach B, Junge X, Lindemann-Matthies P, Walter T. Seasonality, diversity and aesthetic valuation of landscape plots: An integrative approach to assess landscape quality on different scales. Land Use Policy 2016; 53:27-35.
Butler A. Dynamics of integrating landscape values in landscape character assessment: the hidden dominance of the objective outsider. Landscape Research 2016; 41(2):239-52.
Frank S, Fürst C, Koschke L, Witt A, Makeschin F. Assessment of landscape aesthetics—validation of a landscape metrics-based assessment by visual estimation of the scenic beauty. Ecological Indicators 2013; 32: 222-31.
Lu H, Eng HL, Guan C, Plataniotis KN, Venetsanopoulos AN. Regularized common spatial pattern with aggregation for EEG classification in small-sample setting. IEEE transactions on Biomedical Engineering 2010; 57(12):2936-46.
Lubowski-Jahn A. A comparative analysis of the landscape aesthetics of Alexander von Humboldt and John Ruskin. The British Journal of Aesthetics 2011; 51(3):321-33.
Mateo J, Torres AM, García MA, Santos JL. Noise removal in electroencephalogram signals using an artificial neural network based on the simultaneous perturbation method. Neural Computing and Applications 2016; 27(7):1941-57.
Musacchio LR. The scientific basis for the design of landscape sustainability: a conceptual framework for translational landscape research and practice of designed landscapes and the six Es of landscape sustainability. Landscape Ecology 2009; 24(8): 993-1013.
Petrova EG, Mironov YV, Aoki Y, Matsushima H, Ebine S, Furuya K, Petrova A, Takayama N, Ueda H. Comparing the visual perception and aesthetic evaluation of natural landscapes in Russia and Japan: cultural and environmental factors. Progress in Earth & Planetary Science 2015; 2(1): 63-69.
Rosley MSF, Rahman SRA, Lamit H. Biophilia theory revisited: experts and non-experts perception on aesthetic quality of ecological landscape. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 2014; 153: 349-62.
Sherren K, Fischer J, Clayton H, Hauldren A, Dovers S. Lessons from visualising the landscape and habitat implications of tree decline-and its remediation through tree planting-in australia's grazing landscapes. Landscape & Urban Planning 2011; 103(2): 248-58.
Witschi NS. This ecstatic nation: the American landscape and the aesthetics of patriotism/imagining the forest: narratives of Michigan and the upper midwest. American Literature 2013; 85(1): 188-90.
Zanten BTV, Zasada I, Koetse MJ, Ungaro F, Häfner K, Verburg PH. A comparative approach to assess the contribution of landscape features to aesthetic and recreational values in agricultural landscapes. Ecosystem Services 2016; 17: 87-98.
Zervou N. Rethinking fragile landscapes during the Greek crisis: precarious aesthetics and methodologies in athenian dance performances. Research in Drama Education 2017; 22(1): 104-15.