DOI: 10.14704/nq.2018.16.6.1604

Relationship between Extraversion and Employees’ Innovative Behavior and Moderating Effect of Organizational Innovative Climate

Yuyan Luo, Zhi Cao, Lu Yin, Huiqin Zhang, Zhong Wang

Abstract


This paper aims to clarify the relationship between extraversion and employees’ innovative and disclose the moderating effect of organizational innovative climate on that relationship. To this end, 300 employees were selected from various enterprises in three Chinese cities, and subjected to a questionnaire survey based on the five factor model (FFM) and 5-point Likert scale. Through statistical regressions, the author explored the effects of extraversion and organizational innovative climate have on employees’ innovative behavior. Then, the organizational innovative climate was divided into five dimensions, and the feature activation theory was implemented to reveal the moderating effect of each dimension on relationship between extraversion and employees’ innovation. Through the above analysis, it is concluded that extraversion has a positive effect on employees’ innovative behavior; the five dimensions of organizational innovative climate all exert a positive effect on employees’ innovative behavior; the resource support in organizational innovative climate has a moderating effect on the relationship between extraversion and employees’ innovation. The research findings shed new light on the improvement of organizational innovative and the construction of an innovative country.

Keywords


Extraversion, Employees’ Innovative Behavior, Organizational Innovative Climate, Moderating Effect

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall 1980.

Amabile TM, Conti R, Coon H, Lazeby J, Herrom M. Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal 1996; 39(5): 1154-84.

Bahner CA, Clark CB. Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire (16PF). Springer International Publishing, 2018.

Canale N, Vieno A, Bowden-Jones H, Billieux J. The benefits of using the UPPS model of impulsivity rather than the Big Five when assessing the relationship between personality and problem gambling. Addiction 2017; 112(2): 372-73.

Eckes A, Großmann N, Wilde M. Studies on the effects of structure in the context of autonomy-supportive or controlling teacher behavior on students' intrinsic motivation. Learning & Individual Differences 2018; 62: 69-78.

Isaksen SG, Lauer KJ, Ekvall G. Situational Outlook questionnaire: A measure of the climate for creativity and change. Psychological Reports1999; 85(2): 665-74.

Janssen O. Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology 2000; 73(3): 287-302.

Jin H, Wang B, Management SO, University J. An empirical research on relationships among big five personality, employee guanxi and knowledge sharing behavior. Science & Technology Management Research 2017; 21: 146-53.

Li N, Xu H, Xie F. Comparison of three-dimensional personality between smoking and non-smoking high school students. China Journal of Health Psychology 2014; 22(1): 84-86.

Liang F, Li SW, Sun R. the influence of organizational learning on organizational innovative performance from the perspective of SOR. Journal of Management Science 2017; 30(3): 63-74.

Liu Y, Shi JT. Does psychological empowerment mediate the relationship between organizational innovative climate and employee innovative behavior. China Soft Science, 2010(3): 133-44.

liu Y. an empirical research on the relationship between organizational innovative climate and employee innovative behavior from the perspective of psychological empowerment and motivational preference. Shanghai University of Finance and Economics 2011.

Liu Y. Research on the influence process of organizational innovation climate on employees' innovative behavior. Shanghai Jiao Tong University 2010.

Mccrae RR, Costa PT. Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist 1997; 52(5): 509-16.

Schulte M, Ostroff C, Kinicki AJ. Organizational climate systems and psychological climate perceptions: A cross‐level study of climate-satisfaction relationships. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology 2006; 79(4): 645-71.

Shalley CE, Zhou J, Oldham GR. The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management 2004; 30(6): 933-58.

Su WL, Lin XQ. The Influencing of supervisor developmental feedback on employee’s innovative behavior-the effect of core self-evaluation and work engagement. Science and Technology Progress and Policy 2018; 4(35): 101-07.

Sun ZY. Institutional choice in dispute settlement mechanism of regional trade agreements: A model based on transaction costs analysis. Jinan Journal (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 2014; (5): 59-68.

Vuong QH, Napier NK, Vu HK, Nguyen MC, Tran TD. Measuring corporate innovation capacity: Experience and Implications from I2Metrix Implementation in Vietnam. Social Science Electronic Publishing 2014; 1(1): 1-17.

Wang H, Chang Y. The influence of organizational creative climate and work motivation on employee's creative behavior. Journal of Management Science 2017; 30(3): 51-62.

Xu YL. Universities' role in the national innovation system: A comparative analysis on the role of China and Japan. Japan Studies 2017.

Yan L, Zhang ZH. A mixed mechanism model of organizational innovation climate influencing the employee innovative behavior. Science Research Management 2017; 38(9): 97-105.

Zhang L, Lian ZH, Nie T. How does social support lead to performance? The mediated moderating role by work family facilitation perspective. Business Management Journal 2017; 39(6): 116-28.

Zhang T. The effect of big five personality of the commercial bank’s employees on the staff burnout: Perceived social support as mediating variables. Southwestern University of Finance and Economics 2013.

Zhu J, Lin J, Wang X. How online community climate influences members' innovation: An exploration from self-determination theory. Science & Technology Progress & Policy 2017; 34(8): 29-36.


Supporting Agencies





| NeuroScience + QuantumPhysics> NeuroQuantology :: Copyright 2001-2017