DOI: 10.14704/nq.2018.16.6.1673

Behavioral Experiment and Event-related Potentials Experimental Study of the Psychological Mechanism of Art Aesthetic Processing

Feng Xue

Abstract


To explore the behavioral experiment and event-related potentials experimental study of the psychological mechanism of art aesthetic processing. The college students are taken as experimental subjects and influence produced by art aesthetic processing through the behavioral experiment and time-correlation potentials experiment. The clarity, beauty and content availability of art works exert significant impact on the processing fluency of art works and the interaction effect among these three factors is significant. The higher the processing fluency of works, the greater the aesthetic preference obtained. The aesthetic preference is influenced by the processing fluency of art works. The higher the processing fluency, the higher the preference level. The clarity, beauty and content availability of art works all affect the processing fluency of works. The greater the beauty of works, the higher the processing fluency, and thus it can be recognized more quickly.

Keywords


Psychological Mechanism of Art Aesthetic Processing, Behavioral Experiment, Event-related Potential Experiment

Full Text:

PDF

References


Brattico E, Pearce M. The neuroaesthetics of music. Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts 2013; 7(1): 48-61.

Burke M. The neuroaesthetics of prose fiction: pitfalls, parameters and prospects. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2015; 9: 442.

Chatterjee A. Neuroaesthetics: a coming of age story. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2011; 23(1): 53-62.

Cinzia DD, Vittorio G. Neuroaesthetics: a review. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2009; 19(6): 682-87.

Leder H, Belke B, Oeberst A, Augustin D. A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. British Journal of Psychology 2004; 95(4): 489-508.

Maynard P. ‘Neuroaesthetics’, Gombrich, and Depiction. British Journal of Aesthetics 2016; 56(2): 191-201.

Nami MT, Ashayeri H. Where neuroscience and art embrace; The Neuroaesthetics. Basic and Clinical Neuroscience 2011; 2(2): 6-11.

Phelps EA, Ledoux JE. Contributions of the amygdala to emotion processing: from animal models to human behavior. Neuron 2005; 48(2): 175-87.

Reber R, Schwarz N, Winkielman P. Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2004; 8(4): 364-82.

Verstegen I. An Introduction to neuroaesthetics: the neuroscientific approach to aesthetic experience, artistic creativity, and arts appreciation ed. by Jon O. Lauring (review). Leonardo 2016; 49(3): 277-78.


Supporting Agencies





| NeuroScience + QuantumPhysics> NeuroQuantology :: Copyright 2001-2018