DOI: 10.14704/nq.2013.11.2.675

Loving or Fearing Creativity? It’s all in the Definition

Marta Davidovich Ockuly, Ruth Richards


How do we make creativity a bigger part of our lives? This article begins with mentorship at Saybrook, and how at best this can open people’s minds to love of learning, and finding one’s own creative path, rather than fear of how “one is doing” while following someone else’s well-worn trajectory. The article then moves to an original inquiry initiated by the first author as first-year doctoral student, out of concern for developing love of creativity (rather than fear) in her own students. Her professor added some research questions and joined the inquiry. The key question to 114 respondents, contacted online through social media, was “What does creativity mean to you personally?” The answer is not obvious in a culture that often links creativity only with the arts or with famous people, or with creative product—and evaluation of its worth—rather than with the joys of an open-minded creative process conducted in a risk-free atmosphere. The research involved 8 questions via Survey Monkey. Respondents emerged young, tech savvy, highly educated, and often female. Creativity evoked process for 97%, in personal terms for 75% and typically involved everyday (not eminent) creativity. Creative product came up, as did the arts, but not in isolation. Common descriptors included: ideas, imagination, and expression. The authors suggest creativity be presented to learners so as to inspire and engage, using process more than product. Some important implications are discussed.

NeuroQuantology | June 2013 | Volume 11 | Issue 2 | Page 256-262


creative process; creativity; defining creativity; evaluation; graduate education; imagination; mentoring; originality; potential;Ruth Richards; self-expression; wellbeing

Full Text:

Full Text PDF


Hennessey B. The creativity-motivation connection. In J. Kaufman & R. Sternberg (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Creativity. NY: Cambridge University Press, 2011.

Hennessey B and Amabile TA. Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology 2010; 61:569-598.

Kaufman SB. The dark side of creativity [Web log post].

December 5, 2011.

Kelly T and Kelly D. Reclaim your creative confidence. Harvard Business Review 2012; December, 1-5.

Lepore S and Smyth J. (Eds.). The Writing Cure: How Expressive Writing Promotes Health and Emotional Well-Being. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 2002.

Maslow A. Toward a Psychology of Being. NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1968.

Ockuly MD and Richards R. How do you define creativity? Views from the general public. Presented at symposium chaired by R Richards: Healing and growth – When creative process changes us and our lives. American Psychological Association Annual Convention, Florida, August 2012.

Plucker JA, Beghetto RA and Dow GT. Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist 2004; 39(2):83-96.

Puccio GJ, Murdock MC and Mance M. Creative Leadership: Skills that Drive Change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2007.

Richards R. (Ed.). Everyday Creativity and New Views of Human Nature: Psychological, Social, and Spiritual Perspectives. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 2007.

Richards R. Everyday creativity: Process and way of life—Four key issues. In J.C. Kaufman & R.J. Sternberg (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Creativity. NY: Cambridge University Press, 2010.

Richards R, Kolva J, Atkin M, Ockuly, MD, et al. Creativity revalued. NeuroQuantology 2011; 9 (3): 1-26.

Rogers CR. On Becoming a Person. NY: Houghton Mifflin, 1961.

Rogers N. The Creative Connection for Groups: Person-Centered Expressive Arts for Healing and Social Change. Palo Alto, CA: Science & Behavior Books, 2011.

Runco M and Pritzker S. (Eds.). Encyclopedia of Creativity, 2nd Ed. (2 vols.). San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 2011.

Westby V and Dawson E. Creativity: Asset or burden in the traditional classroom. Creativity Research Journal 1995; 8: 1-10.

Supporting Agencies

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

| NeuroScience + QuantumPhysics> NeuroQuantology :: Copyright 2001-2017