DOI: 10.14704/nq.2016.14.1.881

Mind and Tachyons: Six-dimensional Special Relativity - Tachyons may inform us about our future

Syamala D Hari

Abstract


This is another article in a series proposing that memory and thought in our brains consist of tachyons. During the 1970’s and later, tachyon physicists found six-dimensional special relativity with three space and three time dimensions, more suitable for the description of tachyons than the conventional four-dimensional special relativity. In six-dimensional relativity, events observable by a subluminal observer and those by a superluminal observer are located on two different four-dimensional Minkowski-spacetimes in the higher dimensional spacetime. If one assumes that information in the mind of a sentient observer consists of tachyons then the observer’s brain and mind play the roles respectively of a subluminal and a superluminal agent, whenever he/she observes an external material object or an internal thought, emotion, etc. Six-dimensional special relativity then implies that the spacetime of the physical world and the spacetime of phenomenal information of the individual are different four-dimensional Minkowski sheets embedded in the six-dimensional spacetime. Interestingly, this conclusion is compatible with the Material Dualism or Extended Materialism proposed by modern scientists, John Smythies, Bernard Carr, and others who think that physical world and phenomenal world contain two different kinds of matter in relative motion and are located in two different cross-sections of a higher dimensional spacetime that includes at least one more dimension of time than the conventional four-dimensional special relativity. In six-dimensional special relativity, it is possible for tachyons to pass information about likely future states of a subluminal observer to the observer without violating causality. This feature of tachyons together with our hypothesis that intention, will, or volition all consist of tachyons, would explain why the unconscious neural activity called readiness potential precedes awareness of will/intention in the context of volitional or goal-oriented actions.

Keywords


Six-dimensional special relativity; Quantum brain; Tachyons; Conscious and unconscious thought; Material dualism; Extended Materialism; final cause; Libet paradoxes; Extra time dimensions

Full Text:

Full Text PDF

References


Addis DR, Wong AT, Schacter DL. Remembering the past and imagining the future: common and distinct neural substrates during event construction and elaboration. Neuropsychologia 2007; 45(7): 1363–1377.

Bilaniuk OMP, Deshpande VK, Sudarshan ECG. Meta Relativity. Am J Phys 1962; 30: 718-723.

Baars BJ, Gage NM. Cognition, Brain, and Consciousness: Introduction to Cognitive Neuroscience. Academic Press, 2010.

Carr B. A proposed New Paradigm for Matter, Mind and Spirit. Network Review Summer 2010; 3. https://www.scimednet.org/sites/default/files/private/networkreviews/103/article1-bernard.pdf Accessed date: January 8, 2016.

Feinberg G. Possibility of Faster-Than-Light Particles. Phys Rev 1967; 159(5): 1089-1100.

Haggard P, Libet B. Conscious Intention and Brain Activity. Journal of Consciousness Studies 2001; 8(11): 47–63.

Hari SD. Mind and Tachyons: How Tachyon Changes Quantum Potential and Brain Creates Mind. NeuroQuantology 2011; 9(2): 255-270.

Hari SD. Mind and Tachyons: Quantum interactive dualism - Libet’s causal anomalies. NeuroQuantology 2014; 12(2): 247-261.

Libet B, Wright EW, Feinstein B, Pearl DK. Subjective Referral of the Timing for a Conscious Sensory Experience. Brain 1979; 102: 193–224.

Libet B, Gleason CA, Wright EW, Pearl DK. Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (readiness potential). The unconscious initiation of a freely voluntary act. Brain 1983; 102: 623–642.

Libet B. Unconscious cerebral initiative and the role of conscious will in voluntary action. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1985; 8: 529-566.

Libet B. How does conscious experience arise? The neural time factor. Brain Research Bulletin 1999; 50(5/6): 339–340.

Mormann F, Koch C. Neural correlates of consciousness. Scholarpedia 2007; 2(12): 1740. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Neural_correlates_of_consciousness Accessed date: January 10, 2016.

Pavšič M. Towards Understanding Quantum Mechanics, General Relativity and the Tachyonic Causality Paradoxes. Lettere al Nuovo Cimento 1981a; 30(4): 111-115.

Pavšič. M. Unified kinematics of bradyons and tachyons in six-dimensional space-time. J Phys A Math Gen 1981b; 14: 3217-3228.

Recami E. Classical tachyons and possible applications. Rivista Del Nuovo Cimento 1986; 9(6), 1-178.

Smythies J. Brain and Consciousness: The Ghost in the Machines. Journal of Scientific Exploration 2009; 23 (1): 37–50.

Smythies J. Space, Time and Consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies 2003; 10(3): 47–56.

Smythies J. Many Mansions: Special Relativity, Higher-Dimensional Space, Neuroscience, Consciousness and Time. Cosmology 2014; 18: 110-118.

Wolf FA. The Timing of Conscious Experience. Journal of Scientific Exploration 1998; 12(4): 511-542.


Supporting Agencies

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.



| NeuroScience + QuantumPhysics> NeuroQuantology :: Copyright 2001-2017