DOI: 10.14704/nq.2016.14.3.900

Keeping Determinism, Ditching Materialism: A Bohmian Account of Compatibilist Free Will and its Relationship to Criminal Responsibility

Andrew J. Marlow


The contribution of quantum mechanics to the debate on whether free will exists is usually limited to considerations of how the indeterminism implied by certain interpretations of quantum mechanics might allow room for free will where the classical determinism of Newtonian mechanics seemingly would not. However, this Paper advances the idea that such arguments are flawed, as they cannot account for how an agent would exercise control over an indeterministic choice, which could just as easily be resolved by chance or randomness. This Paper will put forward an alternative account of how quantum mechanics could account for free will, based on the deterministic and non-materialistic interpretation of David Bohm. In this interpretation, the human mind, seen objectively as “active information” and perceived subjectively as “meaning”, can have an “informational” causal influence on the behaviour of the human body. This is shown to complement a compatibilist account of free will, where free will is taken to mean simply that an agent can act according to his/her will without impediment and is thus compatible with determinism, and to augment it, by giving mind a fundamental place in reality and thus explaining the mental causation necessary for any account of free will. This analysis is then taken to legal philosophy, to show that a Bohmian account of compatibilist free will can similarly augment the ‘Act Requirement’ of criminal jurisprudence and the ‘formal agency’ element of Brudner’s liberal theory of penal justice, such that it can better ground our philosophical justification of holding individuals responsible for criminal acts.


Free will; determinism; indeterminism; Bohm; compatibilism

Full Text:

Full Text PDF


Atmanspracher H. Quantum Approaches to Consciousness. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Accessed date: October 30, 2015

Beck F and Eccles J. Quantum aspects of brain activity and the role of consciousness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 1992; 89:11357–11361.

Bohm D and Hiley B. The de Broglie Pilot Wave Theory and the Further Development of New Insights Arising Out of It. Foundations of Physics 1982; 12(1): 1001-1016.

Bohm D. Meaning and Information. In Pylkkänen P (ed). The Search for Meaning: The New Spirit in Science and Philosophy, Bath: Crucible, 1989, pp. 1 – 24.

Bohm D.A New Theory of the Relationship of Mind and Matter. Philosophical Psychology 1990; 3(2): 271–286.

Brudner A. Punishment and Freedom: A Liberal Theory of Penal Justice, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.

Clarke R. Libertarian Accounts of Free will. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.

Hart HLA. Essays in the Philosophy of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1968.

Hobbes T. 1958, Leviathan, Indianapolis, Bobbs-Merrill, 1958.

Hume D. A Treatise on Human Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1960.

Kane R. A Contemporary Introduction to Free will. Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2005.

Mill JS. A System of Logic. New York: Harper & Row, 1874.

O’Connor T. Persons and Causes: The Metaphysics of Free will. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.

Skrbina D. Panpsychism in the West. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005.

Stapp HP. Reply to a Critic: “Mind Efforts, Quantum Zeno Effect and Environmental Decoherence”. NeuroQuantology 2012; 10(4):601-5.

Stapp HP. A quantum-mechanical theory of the mind-brain connection. In Kelly EF et al. Beyond Physicalism, Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, 2015; 157–193.

Wendt A. Quantum Mind and Social Science. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2015.

Supporting Agencies

The author is grateful for the continued support of Paavo Pylkkänen, particularly for the constant supply of research materials and guidance he has provided in relation to the ideas of David Bohm.

| NeuroScience + QuantumPhysics> NeuroQuantology :: Copyright 2001-2019