DOI: 10.14704/nq.2016.14.3.904

Soul, Freedom and Truth: Their Relationships with Noetical Algorithmic Incompleteness

Mario Antonio Zatti

Abstract


Since the act of free will must affect synaptic events, where does the energy necessary to induce action potentials of cerebral neurons and synaptic webs come from? The exercise of free will requires the cerebral hardware to be flexible, i.e. it must have an indeterministic character in order to allow a free act to orient this instability in making a choice, thereby reducing the entropy of the system, but a preliminary free act which wants to expend a certain amount of energy is needed, that is, another free act should be involved anterior to, and different from, the orientation of the instability itself, and this also needs a related expenditure of energy, this in turn requiring its own free act to take place… One cannot escape the resort to the infinite. A thermodynamic machine has to dissipate the energetic equivalent of one bit of information to make a choice between two equiprobable events, whereas an immaterial agent does not, nor does it violate any physical law if it is capable of acting on a substrate within the limit of its quantum mechanical indeterminacy. A second parallel aspect in the present discussion has to do with the consequences of Gödel’s theorems of incompleteness concerning mathematics and everything which is subject to logical laws. Gödel has definitively proved that for any logical system there are infinite truths which are not provable, but which the human intellect sees them just as truths. Noetical algorithmic incompleteness together with the necessary separation of the notions of demonstrableness (object language) and truth (metalanguage) speaks of a dualism supporting creativity and truth and freedom. In fact, if human actions, in the absence of any involuntary impulse, should always be connected to logico-mathematical inferences, they should be always completely predictable.

Keywords


free will; logical incompleteness; quantum vitalism; soul; freedom; truth

Full Text:

Full Text PDF

References


Antiseri D. Gloria o miseria della metafisica cattolica italiana? Armando, Roma, 1987; 31.

Argonov VY. Neural Correlate of Consciousness in a Single Electron: Radical Answer to Quantum Theories of Consciousness. NeuroQuantology 2012; 10 (2): 276-285.

Basti GF. Filosofia dell’ uomo. ESD, Bologna, 1995; 351.

Beck F, Eccles JC. Quantum Processes in the Brain: A Scientific Basis for Consciousness. In: Neural Basis of Consciousness. Osaka N. Ed. Benjamins, Amsterdam, 2003; 141-166;

Berlucchi G. Mente e Cervello. In: L’anima e la mente. Andreoli V, Buzzi F. Eds. San Paolo, Cinisello Balsamo, 2012; 137-47

Bertelè F, Olmi A, Salucci A, Strumia A. Scienza, analogia, astrazione. Il Poligrafo, Padova, 1999; 251-265.

Bohm D. Wholeness and the Implicate Order. Routledge, London, 1980.

Boncinelli E. Quel che resta dell’anima. Rizzoli, Milano, 2012; 137.

Born M. Natural Philosophy of Cause and Chance. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1949.

Chaitin G. The Limits of Reason. Sci. American 2006; 294 (3): 54-61.

Chalmers DG. Facing up to the problem of Consciousness. In: Toward a Science of Consciousness. Hameroff SR, Kazniak W, and Scott AC. Eds. MIT Press, Cambridge MASS, 1996; 5.

Cho A. Physicists Create Quantum Link Between Photons That Don’t Exist at the Same Time. Science NOW, 22 May 2013.

Crick F. The Astonishing Hypothesis: The Scientific Search for the Soul. Simon and Shuster, London, 1994.

Cusano N. La dotta ignoranza. [1440] Città Nuova, Roma, 1998.

D’ Espagnat B. On Physics and Philosophy. Princeton Univ. Press, 2006.

Darwin C. The Descent of Man. [1871] Prometeus Books, Amherst, New York, 1998; 11.

Davies PCV, Brown JR. The ghost in the atom. Cambridge Univ. Press, 1986.

Davies PCV. The Mind of God. Simon and Schuster, London, 1992; 192-193.

Debray-Ritzen P. L’ateismo scientifico: uno psichiatra. In: Chabanis C. Dio esiste? No, rispondono. Mondadori, Milano, 1974; 127.

Doyle R. Free Will: The Scandal in Philosophy. Information philosopher, 2011.

Eccles JC. A unitary hypothesis of mind-brain interaction in the cerebral cortex. Proc. Royal Soc. London B 1990; 240: 433-451.

Ekeland I. La matematizzazione del caso. In: Aggiornamenti sull’idea del caso. Noël E. Ed. Bollati Boringhieri, Torino, 1992; 171.

Ellis GFR. Physics, complexity and causality. Nature 2005; 435: 743-745.

Ellis GFR. Physics and the Real World. Metanexus Institute, Science and Religion: Global Perspectives, 2005; Philadelphia, PA, www.metanexus.net

Fabro C. San Tommaso davanti al pensiero moderno. In Livi A, Fabro C, Ocàriz F, Vansteenkiste CMG. Le ragioni del Tomismo. Ares, Milano, 1979; 50: 96-160.

French AP, Fennedy PJ. Niels Bohr: A Centenary Volume. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge MASS, 1985; 101-120.

Galvan S. Introduzione ai teoremi di incompletezza. Franco Angeli, Milano, 1992; 191-202.

Gao S. A possible quantum basis of panpsychism. NeuroQuantology 2003; 1(1): 4-9.

Gao S. The Basis of Indeterminism. Phil Sci Archive 2001, http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/documents .

Ghisalberti A. L’anima da Aristotele a Tommaso d’Aquino. In: L’anima e la mente. Andreoli V, Buzzi F. Eds. San Paolo, Cinisello Balsamo, 2012; 35-36.

Gödel K. Collected Works. Feferman S. Ed. Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1986; 1: 145-95.

Gribbin J. In search of Schrödinger’s cat. Corgi Books, London, 1985.

Hameroff SH, Penrose R. Orchestrated reduction of quantum coherence in brain microtubules: a model for consciousness. J Consciousness Studies 1996; 3: 36-53.

Hameroff SH. Quantum Vitalism. Advances 1997; 13: 13-22.

Hofstadter DR, Dennet DC. The Mind’s I. Basic Books, New York, 1981.

Hofstadter DR. Gödel, Escher, Bach. Basic Books, New York, 1979; 449-50.

Krips H. The metaphysics of quantum theory. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1987.

Kuhlmann M. What Is Real? Sci American 2013; 309(2): 32-9.

Leibniz GW. Scritti filosofici. [1666-1714] UTET, Torino, 1967.

Lucas JR. Minds, Machines and Gödel. Philosophy 1961; XXXVI: 112-27.

Maleeh R, Amani P. Bohm’s Theory of the Relationship of Mind and Matter Revisited. NeuroQuantology 2012; 10(2): 150-163.

Maritain J. Il contadino della Garonna. Morcelliana, Brescia, 1973; 166.

Masolo C, Oltramari A, Gangemi A, Guarino N, Vieu L. La prospettiva dell’ontologia applicata. Rivista di estetica 2003; 22: 170-183.

Maxwell JC. Theory of Heat. [1871] Dover, New York, 2001.

McKay DM. Brains, Machines and Persons. Eerdmans, Grand Rapids MI, 1980.

Megidish E, Halevy A, Shacham T, Dvir T, Dovrat L, Eisenberg HS. Entanglement Between Photons that have Never Coexisted. Phys Rev Lett 2013; 110: 210403.

Monod J. Le hazard et la nécessité. Seuil, Paris, 1970; 86-98.

Musso P. Filosofia del Caos. Franco Angeli, Milano, 1977; 174-75.

Ocàriz F. Il Pensiero di San Tommaso. In: Livi A, Fabro C, Ocàriz F, Vansteenkiste CMG. Le ragioni del Tomismo. Ares, Milano, 1979; 96-160.

Penrose R. The Emperor’s New Mind. Oxford Univ. Press, 1989; 110, 412, 421.

Penrose R. The Large, the Small and the Human Mind. Cambridge Univ. Press, 1997.

Philippi CL, Feinstein JS, Khalsa SS, Damasio A, Tranel D, Landini G et al., Preserved Self-Awareness Following Extensive Bilateral Brain Damage to the Insula, Anterior Cingulate, and Medial Prefrontal Cortices. PloS ONE, 2012; 7(8): e38413 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0038413

Popper KR, Eccles JC. The Self and its Brain. Springer, New York, 1977.

Popper KR. Società aperta, universo aperto. Borla, Roma 1984; 102-109, 133.

Poppi A. La Verità. La Scuola, Brescia, 1984; 95.

Rahner K. Science, évolution et pensée chrétienne. Desclée De Bouwer, Paris, 1967; 111.

Ratzinger J. - Benedetto XVI. Progetto di Dio. [1985] Marcianum Press 2012, p 133. According to M. Heller (The New Physics and a New Theology. Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 1996.

Ratzinger J. - Benedetto XVI. Progetto di Dio. [1985] Marcianum Press, 2012; 134.

Searl JR. The Rediscovery of the Mind. MIT Press, Cambridge MASS, 1992; 127-129.

Sperry RW. Mental Phaenomena as Causal Determinants in Brain Function. In: Consciousness and the Brain. Globus GG, MaxwelI G, Savodnik I. Eds. Plenum Press, New York, 1976; 163.

Stegmüller W. Metaphysik. Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York, 1969.

Sutherland S. Science and Faith in Mind. Nature 1981; 290: 167.

Swinburne R. The Evolution of the Soul. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1986; 210.

Szilard L. Uber die Entropieverminderung in einem Thermodynamischen System bei Eingriffen Intelligenter Wesen. Zeitschrift fur Physik 1929; 53: 840-856.

Tarski A. Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics. Papers from 1923 to 1938. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1956; VIII: 152-278.

Tarski A. Truth and Proof. Sci. American 1969; 220: 63-77.

Teilhard de Chardin P. Le phénomèn humain. Seuil, Paris, 1955; 335.

VVAA. L’Anima. Berti E, Ivaldo M, Mura G, Possenti V. Eds. Mondadori, Milano, 2004.

VVAA. Mental Causation and Ontology. Gibb S, Lowe EG, Ingthorsson RD. Eds. Oxford Univ. Press, 2013.

Weinert F. Quantum mechanics: The Physicist turns Philosopher. Conference Proceedings of 100 Years Quantum Theory, Madrid, 2000. http://www.staff.brad.ac.uK/fweinert

Whitehead AN. Adventures of Ideas. Macmillan, London, 1933.

Wojtyla K. Amore e responsabilità. Marietti, Casale Monferrato, 1980; c.I.

Wurzman R, Giordano J. Mind, matter, neuroscience and physics. NeuroQuantology 2009; 7(3): 368-381.

Zatti M. Anthropic Biology. In: The Anthropic Principle. Curi U. Ed. Cambridge Univ. Press, 1993; 129-142.

Zatti M. Il dolore nel creato: un disegno intelligente? Rubbettino, Soveria Mannelli, 2013.


Supporting Agencies

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.



| NeuroScience + QuantumPhysics> NeuroQuantology :: Copyright 2001-2018