DOI: 10.14704/nq.2016.14.3.919

A Comparison of the Evolution and Entropy of Responses to Picture Choices on an “Absurdum Questionnaire” between Members of Two Different Training Groups

Begoña Trojaola Zapirain, Federico Carminati, Miguel Angel Gonzalez Torres, Ernesto Gonzalez de Mendivil, Claire Fouassier, François Martin, José Labarere, Jacques Demongeot, Erika Nora Lorincz, Giuliana Galli Carminati


The results of previous studies on a group-training program for group therapists supported the influence of group dynamics on the members’ individual choices of pictures presented to them in an “absurdum questionnaire.” The present analysis compared the responses obtained from previous studies with those from a group of psychiatric caregivers training to prevent and manage aggression of hospitalized patients. The evolution of the number and entropy of the responses to the picture choices were compared. The group analysis program was conducted at the Basque Foundation for the Investigation of Mental Health in Bilbao, Spain. The Preventive Approach and Controlled Intervention program for the prevention and management of aggression was held in Geneva, Switzerland. Data were collected from the participants in the group-analysis program during their 11 sessions of training and from those in the aggression prevention and management program during three days of a series of four-day courses. The participants were presented with an “absurdum questionnaire” containing 50 pairs of images, and were asked to choose one image from each pair. The evolution of the number of answers was not significantly different between the two training groups. The evolution of entropy revealed a clear difference with a gradual increase in the group-analysis program, and a decrease in the aggression-management training group. We interpret this difference in light of Bion’s view of group dynamics, with the group-analysis training being driven by Bion’s basic assumptions and the aggression-management training by Bion’s work group.


: Group Analysis; Psychophysics; Jungian psychology; Bion’s basic assumptions; Enthropy

Full Text:

Full Text PDF


Aspect A, Grangier P, Roger G. Experimental realization of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm Gedanken Experiment: a new violation of Bell’s inequalities. Phys Rev Lett 1982;49: 91-94. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.91.

Avery J. Information theory and evolution. Singapore: World Scientific; 2003.

Balian R. Entropy, a protean concept. In Dalibard J, Poincaré Seminar 2003: Bose-Einstein condensation – entropy. Basel: Birkhäuser; 2004: pp. 119-144.

Bell J. On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox. Physics 1964a;1: 195-200.

Bell J. On the problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics. Rev Mod Phys 1964b;38: 447.

Bion W. Experiences in groups and other papers. London: Tavistock Publications Ltd.; 1961.

Boltzmann L. The second law of thermodynamics. Populare Schriften, Essay 3, address to a formal meeting of the Imperial Academy of Science, 29 May 1886, reprinted. In: Boltzmann L, Theoretical physics and philosophical problems: selected writings: 5 (Vienna Circle Collection), Springer; 30 Nov 1974.

Brillouin L. Science and information theory. 2nd ed. New York: Academic Press; 1962.

Brooks DR, Wiley EO. Evolution as entropy: towards a unified theory of biology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1988.

Chen J. The physical foundation of economics: an analytical thermodynamic theory. Singapore: World Scientific; 2005.

Clausius R. On the motive power of heat, and on the laws which can be deduced from it for the theory of heat. Poggendorff’s Annalen der Physick. LXXIX, Dover Reprint; 2010.

Einstein A, Podolsky B, Rosen N. Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys Rev. 1935;47: 777-780. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.47.777.

Foulkes SH. Therapeutic group analysis. New York: International Universities Press; 1962.

Frigg R, Werndl C. Entropy: a guide for the perplexed. In: Beisbart C, Hartmann S. editors. Probabilities in physics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011.

Georgescu-Roegen N. The entropy law and the economic process. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1971.

Lugosi G, Noble AB. Consistency of data-driven histogram methods for density estimation and classification. Ann Stat 1996;24: 687-706.

Noble AB. Histogram regression estimation using data-dependent partitions. Ann Stat 1996;24: 1084-1105.

Schrödinger E, Bohr M. Discussion of probability relations between separated systems. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 1935;31: 555-563. doi: 10.1017/S0305004100013554.

Schrödinger E, Dirac P. Probability relations between separated systems. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 1936;32: 446-452. doi:10.1017/S0305004100019137.

Shannon CE, Weaver W. The mathematical theory of communication. Champaign: University of Illinois Press; 1949.

Tribus M, McIrvine EC. Energy and information. Sci Am 1981:224; 178-184.

Trojaola-Zapirain B, Carminati F, Gonzalez Torres A, Gonzales de Mendivil E, Fouassier C, Labarere J, et al., Group unconscious common orientation: exploratory study at the Basque Foundation for the Investigation of Mental Health group training for therapists. NeuroQuantology 2014;12: 139-150.

Trojaola-Zapirain B, Carminati F, Gonzalez Torres A, Gonzales de Mendivil E, Fouassier C, Gex-Fabry M, et al., Addendum on entropy to the exploratory study on group unconscious at the Basque Foundation for the Investigation of Mental Health Group training for therapists. NeuroQuantology 2015;13: 49-56

Vergopoulo T. La sensibilisation à la dynamique de groupe d’après. Méd et Hyg. 1983; 41: 3149-3155. French.

Yockey HP. Information theory, evolution, and the origin of life. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2005.

Zanello A, Rouget-Weber B, Gex-Fabry MG, Maercker A, Guimon J. A new instrument to assess social functioning in mental health settings. Eur J Psychiatry 2004;18: 76-84.

Supporting Agencies

| NeuroScience + QuantumPhysics> NeuroQuantology :: Copyright 2001-2017