Volume 20 No 9 (2022)
Download PDF
A study to compare the rate of union of operatively treated Vs the non-operatively treated closed tibial diaphyseal fracture
Dr Amol Kashinath Dange, Dr Vinod L Rathod, Dr Sushant. P. Shrivastava
Abstract
Fractures of the tibia are important for two reasons. The first is that they are common; the second that
they are controversial – and anything that is both common and controversial must be important”. By
reason of its superficial location, the tibial shaft represents the most common site of long-bone
fractures. A long period of convalescence is inherent even to an uncomplicated healing course of this
notorious fracture. Both conservative and surgical techniques have been introduced in an effort to
speed time to union while minimizing the occurrence of complications such as residual deformity,
consolidation problems, refracture, infection, compartment syndrome, peripheral nerve injuries,
anterior knee pain, joint stiffness and vascular complications. The purpose of this study was to observe
any changes in the rate of union in fracture of Tibia comparing both methods and to evaluate optimal
method of treatment of these fractures.
Keywords
Rate of Union, Operative, non-operative, Closed Tibial, Diaphyseal, Fracture
Copyright
Copyright © Neuroquantology
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the Neuroquantology are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IJECSE right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.