Technology’s role in clinical neurology has grown exponentially during the past two decades. Physicians have forgotten that it is their responsibility to help their patients die in peace and comfort, as this is now a legally protected fundamental inherent right according to the Common Cause decision. There is a chance that India’s strong religious beliefs opposing abortion and euthanasia would ultimately trump the recently legitimized right to die with dignity by the country’s highest court. People in India with terminal diseases have flooded government offices and the courts with requests for palliative care regulations. This is largely a legal and ethical discussion, but it has also touched on issues of human rights, health, religion, economics, spirituality, and culture. According to professionals in the field of public health, it is crucial to determine the mental health of the person requesting euthanasia. Feelings of hopelessness, sadness, and unhappiness are typically at the forefront of people’s minds when they decide to terminate their lives through euthanasia. The study seeks to trace the debate of death with dignity and neuroscience in terms of passive euthanasia in the form of withdrawal of life support system.

Right to die, Die with Dignity, Euthanasia, Neurology, Neuroscience