


Volume 20 No 15 (2022)
Download PDF
THE PROSEAL LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY WAS COMPARED TO THE I-GELTM IN VARIOUS HEAD-AND-NECK POSTURESIN ANAESTHETIZED PARALYSED YOUNGSTERS
Lokya Naik S,Bhadri sreenivasulu,Dr. S.Lokya Naik
Abstract
Head and neck movements affect the curvature of the pharynx, which impacts ventilation with
supragothic airway devices and oropharyngeal leakage pressures. Anaesthetized paralyzed children
were fitted with laryngeal mask airways (PLMA) made of gel and silicone. The PLMAs were used to study
the effect of different head/neck positions on oropharyngeal leak pressures and ventilation. PLMA (n =
35) and I-GelTM (n = 35) were randomly assigned to 70 children for airway management. At maximum
extension, maximum flexion, and neutral position, either for oropharyngeal leak pressure was the
primary outcome. Among the data collected were PIPs, expiratory tidal volumes, ventilation scores, and
fiber optic grading. When neutral, flexion, or extensions were performed, there was no significant
difference in leak pressure between PLMA and I-GelTM. Compared to PLMA, I-GelTM had a bigger mean
(standard deviation, P = 0.002) and a significantly lower mean (SD). In addition, expired tidal volume was
significantly lower, with 5.5 [1.6] compared to 6.9 ml/kg, P = 0.0017. There was no significant difference
in fibreoptic grading or ventilation score between the two groups in any of the three head-and-neck
positions. The oropharyngeal leakage pressures of PLMA and I-GelTM were the same in all three headand-neck positions. When using I-Gel, higher peak pressures and lower expiratory volumes may
necessitate caution and further investigation when the patient is in maximal neck flexion.
Keywords
I-GEL TM, PLMA, Supraglottic airway disease
Copyright
Copyright © Neuroquantology
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the Neuroquantology are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IJECSE right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.